But some scientists have applied carbon dating to dinosaur bones. If we apply the standard assumptions that scientists typically apply when using carbon dating, we come up with these simple results: If this is not correct , it could mean the dating method is flawed because the assumptions are wrong, and all dates gathered using the method are suspect.
- best catchy headlines for online dating.
- Previous Broadcasts.
- gay dating sites germany.
- best online dating profile man.
- college matchmaking site.
It could also mean the bone specimens were contaminated which is highly unlikely. But if there is no contamination, the results heavily imply that the theory that dinosaurs died 65 million years ago is incorrect. In this particular case, the dinosaurs were dated to between 10, and 25, years old.
What exactly are we dating here? Sample contamination and general trustworthyness
But since the age predicted by the method is wrong i. But the differences arise because of the underlying presuppositions about the past of the two groups. The museum curator from whose museum the dinosaur bone samples were taken was outraged. You have to know how old the sample is before you test it, you see.
‘Carbon-14-dated dinosaur bones less than 40,000 years old’ report scrapped from conference website
Otherwise your results are wrong. An objective scientist would explore the discrepancies produced by the dating methods. If dinosaur bones are not 65 million years old, then this poses serious problems to the entire modern science guild who has built its house upon the sandy shores of evolution theory.
Grant money is at stake. Jobs and careers are at stake. Their conclusions differ because their bounding conditions and assumptions about the past differ. They are hostile, as the quotes above demonstrate. Their personal god may be Mammon, or job security. They have vested interests in one or both of those things.
Carbon 14 and Dinosaur Bones | f.e-safety.com.ua
They also have a different, but significant vested interest: They must prove that He is not real. Soft tissues in dinosaur bones: Is there carbon 14 in dinosaur bones? Rebuild America's Biblical Worldview. You are commenting using your WordPress. You are commenting using your Twitter account.
You are commenting using your Facebook account. Notify me of new comments via email. Notify me of new posts via email. Rebuild Your Biblical Worldview. Providing biblically-based commentary to help build up Christians to take charge and lead with confidence. Home About Biblical Worldview? Posted on June 23, 3 Comments.
- dating iranian girl.
- What happens if you date dinosaur bones using the carbon-14 method?.
- 10 days with my devil shiki dating a demon walkthrough.
Pass it on to friends: This entry was posted in Dinosaurs , Evolution and tagged carbon 14 dating , dinosaur bones , science. The young earth model predicts the finding of significant quantities of carbon 14 throughout the bone. The evolutionary model would predict no modern carbon in such a bone, but as a secondary assumption, if 14c is found, since any contaminating material would have to pass through the outer layers of the bone to get into the center, the contamination explanation would expect to measure generally decreasing percentages of 14c from the outside to the center of each individual bone.
A second experiment, beginning as above, would be to date a small diameter bone and a larger diameter bone from the same dinosaur. Getting the same dates would help rule out contamination because the smaller bone will have a larger surface to volume ratio which, if contamination were a significant factor, should result in higher percentages of modern carbon. A third experiment that could falsify contamination as a possible source of 14c involves: With the announcement that these reserves in Siberia contain diamonds that are "twice as hard as normal", these will be ideal for 14c dating because their natural hardness would further rule out contamination.
Also, evolutionary geologists claim that these diamonds were already ancient when, allegedly 35 million years ago, a meteor impacted above them. The evolutionary model predicts no carbon dead 14c. The young earth model predicts significant quantities of 14c measurable throughout the diamond. A fourth experiment that could falsify contamination as a possible source of 14c involves radiocarbon dating of allegedly million-year-old amber, by selecting pristine specimens, the condition of which may also help to rule out contamination.
Hear Bob's interview with Steve. Also, at the 7th ICC Dr.
Dating bones in situ , and dating their surrounding matrix, will elimate various sources of possible contamination and provide significant additional data. Published by RSR on Aug. Consider then, the fossil remains of organisms that had lived near the surface but that have been long buried in ocean sediments. If neutron capture were responsible for much of the unexpected 14c, then collectively, such ocean specimens, collectively, should have far less 14c than specimens excavated on the continents. Further, more analysis should be done on relevant specimens excavated from uranium mines , comparing their radiocarbon percentages to similar in type and estimated date specimens gathered away from uranium mines.
Thus, marine deposit specimens and uranium mine specimens can function as control groups. Regardless though, for an uncontaminated specimen like diamonds, pure collagen, dinosaur soft tissue, etc. Out of every trillion Carbon atoms in the atmosphere, only about one is 14c. Further, significant unknowns, both in the rates of 14c production in the atmosphere, and in the Earth's enormous geologic upheaval in the past, could have altered the 1,,,,to-1 ratio. Henry Richter , the NASA scientist who launched our first satellite, oversaw development of the scientific equipment used on the first lunar missions, and who played an important role in the early discovery of the Van Allen radiation belt.
By the way, Dr. Though it may be an extremely negligible source, of the various emissions from radioactive decay alpha particles, beta particles, etc. If you know of a web page where this is described, please email that link to Bob kgov. Also, as only widely recognized in , lightning can produce 14c. We have a young earth! Long-term, authoritative, and worldwide measurements show that the Earth's magnetic field is decaying rapidly as NASA's data shows is also true of Mercury.
Our planet's more powerful magnetic field in the past better shielded Earth from cosmic rays, resulting in less Carbon production. This means that carbon ages of specimens from past millennia and even from only centuries ago need to be adjusted downward. So apart from adjustment for the exponentially decaying magnetic field, specimens are therefore younger than their radiocarbon age indicates.
For, living with a stronger field, plants and animals absorbed less radiocarbon. So, in addition to the evidence for rapid radioactive decay at the time of the global flood, the Earth's decaying magnetic field means that specimens are generally younger than claimed by Carbon dating.
Considering Contamination
This effect may be significant going back even only to the time of Christ, and might also be a factor in why 14c dating of the artifacts of the Pharaohs were not as helpful as had been hoped for in resolving debates in chronology among Egyptologists. RSR predicts that even allegedly million-year-old amber will show significant quantities of modern carbon.
See more at RealScienceRadio. The scientific community has now faslified its own supernova theory for the origin of elements heavier than iron. And any suggestion, including the neutron star merger hypothesis, that proposes production of such elements in deep space is a non-starter and falsified by the solar system's non-uniform distribution of isotopes. Therefore, the last theory standing for the origin of radioactivity, and the one that explains the physical evidence and has extensive experimental support from laboratory science, is Walt Brown's creation-based Hydroplate Theory as described at rsr.
As a former on-air guest rsr. In the HPT, what appears to be accelerated radioactive decay applies to elements in the crust and inside the subterranean water chamber beneath the firmament. So as a result of widespread misunderstanding of Earth's history, old-earth geologists contend with infamously contradictory million- and billion-year radiometric dates, whereas carbon dating is not subject to the same extreme physical forces that play havoc with other radiometric dating methods. Scientists have been surprised to find primarily left-handed i.
Duane Gish, highly qualified to address the topic, points out that factors affecting a specimen, including variation in temperature and especially pH acidity vs. Merely giving the old-age assumption the benefit of the doubt, however, by assuming the lowest reasonable alkalinity and temperatures for the life of the specimen, retains amino acid racemization as a powerful tool for falsifying million and billion year dates, especially when combined with extant soft tissue and plentiful radiocarbon.
For links to the on-air and written debates, round by round, see kgov. And click here for Bob's final round post! Steven Spielberg had famed paleontologist Jack Horner on the set as a technical advisor during the filming of all three Jurassic Park blockbuster movies. Acts of the Apostles Pt Greg Abbott or an Amoeba?
Lewis and His Family Lost their Faith. Victory Church Vindicated re Dylan Walborn. Carbon 14 and Dinosaur Bones. Jan 17, ThThurs: Jan 15, The Sequel's Here!