Anything different is useless, as maximum tier allowed is 8 and bringing even tier 7s would put you at too much of a disadvantage. The matchmaker in team battles does NOT account for what tier vehicles are in the team, only for player skill in 'personal rating'. If you really want to play tier 6s, just play random battles. By the way, light tank matchmaking is getting changed in 9. For example, tier 4 lights will only be able to see tier 7 max, tier 5 lights will only see tier 8 max etc. Skarium, on 25 May - The thing that at least should be done is inform ppl who are joining Team Battles.
The Situation
Since it allows ppl to make such t4 teams and being rolled over and give free win to T8 teams. Complaints of player balance will still exist regardless of what system they put in, and this would just exponentially increase queue times the higher your rating goes. ScalaLV, on 25 May - Then they should limit the usable tiers to 1,2,8, because the others aren't usable anyway or what? HPoltergeist, on 26 May - It really was only a matter of time before the optimal tier spread was found and the tanks that should be used when the team has complete control over their tank line up.
Going with anything less and you are going to be minced by someone who has one of the optimal setups. This is one of the main reasons I wrote this here.
- Preferential matchmaking.
- how to first message online dating?
- dating alone airing time?
- dating service london ontario?
- Preferential matchmaking - Newcomers' Forum - World of Tanks official forum.
- Serious problems and abuse with matchmaking.
I understand that the is the optimal team setup, but this is the reason why a more balanced or customized team battle option is needed. That should be changed and done. HPoltergeist, on 27 May - But in a general sense, it would take less than a few hours for someone to find the optimal setup in the tier brackets per se, and you'd end up straight back at square one again.
Give someone a choice over the composition of their entire team and they're going to take advantage, even if you introduce tier bracketing in a sense since you are limiting the tier a team can face given their setup , there will be the same type of problem that you have tried to point out. Karukute, on 27 May - People are don't play team battles because it has no sense playing other tanks than t8 besides some t filling to push average down. If the system would be changed, more people would play this game mode, means more teams to match.
There would be many more balanced battle that way, and many more options, other than the constant t8 fights. The balancing you have suggested would be generally unviable, since it hinges around the fact that a considerable number of players will adhere to single tier restrictions other than maxing points, such that queue times aren't exponentially long.
That's what the matchmaker is for Don't worry if there was a reliable matchmaker with these properties there were more players to choose from so the queue wouldn't be so long either. This topic is to give ideas to improve the matchmaker what clearly needs it, not to explain the one is used already. Besides, don't carry it high, what if I haven't understood what you've exactly meant? If there were no points to max out, only restrictions, people would max the setup based on the restrictions. Maxing will always exist when you give complete control over the team setup.
If there were stringent tier vs tier battles, tier brackets would be maximised allowing only one viable setup, where all others are irrelevant so anything other than it, you are going to die. If you start adding something based on average tier, T1 tanks will be used to bring the average tier of a team down so they face lower tiered teams, rather than fill the void of point slots as they do now.
There will always be optimisation, and using the tools given to you to maximise your winning potential. Then if you start adding a secondary search parameter, average player rating, do you really want to extrapolate the queue times with a secondary search parameter such as this?
Serious problems and abuse with matchmaking - Archive - World of Tanks official forum
The current system for random struggles to even tank type across teams, how would it do with this addition? If I were you, I would put your focus elsewhere, you either play Team Battles as a stringent team which is basically what it was made for, stringent, organised people to fight the same, or play random battles with a couple of platoon friends because you want to fight against a rag tag bunch of tanks with the same. Community Forum Software by IP.
- cs go connection to matchmaking servers is unreliable?
- VanossGaming;
- house of glass matchmaking?
Search Advanced Search section: Serious problems and abuse with matchmaking Started by HPoltergeist , May 24 Matchmaking problems and abuse 39 members have cast votes You have to complete 50 battles in order to participate this poll. Do you agree, and want change concerning written in the opening post?
- Matchmaking Table | For the Record.
- dating gunnedah?
- Fixes to Preferential Matchmaking | Announcements | World of Tanks.
HPoltergeist 1 Posted 24 May - If you can implement this check, it will be much more playable. I'll be back until I see serious change in this system of matchmaking. Please forgive my manner, but it's really annoying for now. The problem is the luchs. It gets scout matchmaking.
Try not to platoon with it. Here's the matchmaking table Spoiler. HPoltergeist 3 Posted 24 May - Thanks, but no matter what, this should not be this way.
Skarium 4 Posted 24 May - HPoltergeist 5 Posted 24 May - Improve aiming time from 2. Increase penetration from to mm for the standard shell and from to mm for the Premium shell Increased penetration value, improved gun handling parameters. Minor improvements to turret armoring. The vehicle remains a multi-purpose HT. Improve aiming time from 3. Improve the specific power from Kept and improved the role of a dynamic HT; increased battle performance.
Increase the penetration value of the standard shell from to mm Overall improvement of the technical characteristics. Increase the penetration value of the standard shell from to mm Minor improvement of the vehicle that does not require major adjustments. Increase dynamics and specific power from 14 to Overall improvement of the technical characteristics. Improved gun handling parameters. Increase the penetration value of the standard shell from to mm Players feel rather negative about this vehicle.
World of Tanks - Update 1.0.2 Review
Increase damage per minute from 1, to 1, Increase dynamics and specific power from 9. Increase the penetration value of the standard shell from to mm The worst vehicle on the list in terms of statistics. Share on social networks or discuss on the forum Facebook Twitter. Join the community More than ,, players. Join us on Facebook 2,, in the community. Follow us on Twitter , subscribers. Watch us on YouTube , subscribers. Increase penetration from to mm for the standard shell and from to mm for the Premium shell. Increased penetration value, improved gun handling parameters.
Minor improvement of the vehicle that does not require major adjustments. Review the vehicle armoring; make minor improvement to overall armoring possibly.